Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Heckler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1985No. 85 Civ. 6208(WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

Plaintiff brought this action under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1982 & Supp. II 1984), seeking review of a final determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) that plaintiff is not disabled as defined by the Act, and therefore is not entitled to disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff had alleged disability due to a severe schizo-effeetive disorder. In an Order dated November 27, 1985, familiarity with which is presumed, I remanded this action to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heckler v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of New York v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Cohen v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saltares v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Weiser v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Hoffman v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API