In re GlaxoSmithKline plc
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
The Minnesota Attorney General (the state) served a civil investigative demand on GlaxoSmithKline pic (GSK), requesting certain documents. GSK complied but designated many of the documents as confidential, precluding release of those documents to the public. The state filed a motion in Hennepin County District Court challenging the confidentiality designation on some of those documents. The district court denied the state’s motion, holding that the disputed documents are protected from disclosure by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, the First…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Glaxosmithkline Plc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007