Legal Opinion
Bublitz v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1996No. C5-95-1603PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Robert Bublitz, Jr. (Bublitz) petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to review a decision and order of the Minnesota Tax Court. Bublitz appealed to the Minnesota Tax Court from an order of the Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) dated March 30, 1994, assessing a controlled substance tax and penalty against Bublitz in the amount of $197,600 pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 297D.04 (1994). Bublitz argued that the tax assessed, after the forfeiture of a Chevrolet Suburban (Suburban) he had used in a controlled substance crime, constituted double punishment. The Honorable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- American Ass'n of Cereal Chemists v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Tarutis v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Reil v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Doe v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.