Legal Opinion
United States v. Rosario Nick Colletti, Jack Salvatore Russo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 7, 1957No. 24498_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The sufficiency of the evidence to take tlje case to the jury, being clear, the appellant relies for reversal on only claimed trial errors.
The failure of the government to identify the so-called “special employee” with whom Agent Palma arranged for the purchase of the heroin is of no consequence. There was no request for that. Absent such an application to the court, the appellant has failed to show any denial of his rights and Rovario v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639; Portomene v. United States, 5 Cir., 221 F.2d 582; United States v. Conforti, 7 Cir., 200 F.2d 365;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Morton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. John David ProvooCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Narberto Angelo Portomene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Sidney GlasserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Samuel G. BenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Lloyd G. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. John MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.