Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel G. Beno

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 12, 1963No. 44, Docket 28226PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge.

Samuel G. Beno, an Internal Revenue Agent, was convicted by a jury of soliciting and receiving a set of the En-cyclopaedia Britannica and a dictionary from a taxpayer, intending that they in-. fluence his official decisions in violation of federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 202. On appeal, Beno contends that the prosecution was improperly permitted to educe on cross-examination highly prejudicial evidence concerning specific acts of the defendant which were wholly unrelated to the offense charged, and was further allowed to introduce extensive independent damaging testimony with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. John David ProvooCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. ConfortiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Carl BenedettoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. State v. TurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. United States v. Bryan Canniff and John BenignoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API