Legal Opinion

United States v. Thoresen

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 21, 1967No. Crim. 41422PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS

OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendants William E. Thoresen III and Louise B. Thoresen have been indicted for violation of federal firearm control laws. Counts 1-9 of the indictment charge both defendants under 26 U.S.C. § 5851 with unlawful possession of firearms as defined by 26 U.S.C. § 5848 (eight fully automatic weapons and one shotgun pistol). Counts 10 and 11 charge defendant Louise B. Thoresen alone with possession of firearms under the above statutes (a shotgun pistol and a fully automatic weapon). Counts 12 through 22, except 17, charge…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. William Erness Thoresen, United States of America v. Louise Banich ThoresenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. WatlingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. RiggsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  4. People v. PietramalaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  5. Associated Hobby Manufacturers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API