Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. O'DELL

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1966No. 18514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice.

Ralston Purina Company, the appellant herein, instituted this action against Jack O’Dell to recover the sum of $9,102-.69 for goods and merchandise sold him between December 5, 1960 and June 28, 1961. Joined as defendants were Bill E. O’Dell, Louise Jeter O’Dell and Nancy Jolly O’Dell under agreement whereby they allegedly guaranteed payment of the said account. Jack O’Dell denied the existence and the amount of the indebtedness and filed a counterclaim for the alleged fraudulent procurement and use of the credit instruments. The other three defendants denied execution of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skipper v. HartleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Gulledge v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dome Laboratories v. Farrell Ex Rel. FarrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Marlow v. MarlowCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Moore v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Walker v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Knight v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API