Legal Opinion

Knight v. Waggoner

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 2004No. 3819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, J.:

James E. Knight, Jr., and Fredrick Zeigler (Appellants) appeal a ruling by the trial court at the close of evidence allowing Jene Marie Waggoner (Respondent) to voluntarily withdraw counterclaims for trespass and conversion upon a motion by Appellants for a directed verdict on those claims. Appellants contend that dismissing these counterclaims without prejudice was an abuse of the trial judge’s discretion. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants own property located at 813 Harden Street, Columbia, South Carolina, which adjoins Respondent’s vacant lot at the rear of Respondent’s property.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Silvester v. Spring Valley Country ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Gulledge v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Moore v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Cutchin v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Ralston Purina Co. v. O'DELLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. CarmackCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API