In re Campbell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner, rejecting all of the claims of appellant’s application, five in number, for want of patentability in view of the prior art.
*1352Claims 5 and 9 are illnstratiye of the claims in issue 'and read as follows:
5. The combination with a reciprocating pump having power and water cylinders at the opposite ends thereof and connected together by a cradle, of bosses extending outwardly from the power and water cylinders and formed thereon, tie rods extending through the bosses…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Crouch v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Parson Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Hinchman v. Jim Robbins Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953
- Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Roman Stripe Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941