Legal Opinion

In re Campbell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1931No. 2732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner, rejecting all of the claims of appellant’s application, five in number, for want of patentability in view of the prior art.

*1352Claims 5 and 9 are illnstratiye of the claims in issue 'and read as follows:

5. The combination with a reciprocating pump having power and water cylinders at the opposite ends thereof and connected together by a cradle, of bosses extending outwardly from the power and water cylinders and formed thereon, tie rods extending through the bosses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  2. Crouch v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Parson Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Hinchman v. Jim Robbins Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953
  3. Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Roman Stripe Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API