Legal Opinion

Parson Mfg. Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 10, 1911No. 89PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Suit in equity by the Parson Manufacturing Company against Charles T. Coe, trading as the New York Grate Bar Company. Decree for defendant (180 Fed. 7-12), and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the Parson Manufacturing Company, the patent owner, filed a bill against Coe and others, charging infringement of the several specified claims, viz.: Claim 1, patent No. ,573,480, granted December 22, 1896, to Henry E. Parson, for a steam blower; claims 1 and 2 of reissue No. 12,072 (of No. 681,457), granted January 6, 1903, to Henry I). Parson, assignor to complainant, for a smoke-consuming furnace; and claims 3 and 2 of patent No. 702,585, granted June 37, 1902, to Henry E-Parson, for a grate bar. That court in an opinion reported in 180 Fed.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parson Mfg. Co. v. CoeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CampbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. In re PrinzlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. McClave-Brooks Co. v. M. H. Treadwell Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Bellows v. New York Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API