Legal Opinion

Zirn v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for Ebel. The answers interposed to the amended complaint set out certain denials and four complete and partial defenses. Order denying plaintiff’s cross motion to strike out affirmative defenses as insufficient in law .affirmed. Order granting defendants motion to examine plaintiff before trial in aid of their affirmative defenses affirmed. Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to examine defendants before trial modified by granting also plaintiff’s motion to require Neil P. CuUom and John T. Harrison similarly to be examined and give testimony as material…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hale v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Heidell v. George A. Murray Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Cataldo v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Erdenbrecher v. ErdenbrecherNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lubitz v. Port of New York AuthorityCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API