Legal Opinion
Day v. New Hampshire Retirement System
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 23, 1993No. 92-370PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, New Hampshire Retirement System (retirement system), appeals from an order of the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.) requiring it to pay accidental disability benefits to the plaintiff, Judith R. Day. The retirement system argues that the trial court erred in ruling that it was collaterally estopped from considering the cause, extent, and permanency of Day’s injuries, notwithstanding that these issues had been adjudicated by the New Hampshire Department of Labor in a workers’ compensation case between Mrs. Day and her employer, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation. We hold…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Traub v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ainsworth v. ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Manchester School District v. Crisman Ex Rel. Kimberli M.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- In re CarrierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Aranson v. SchroederSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Farm Family Mutual Insurance v. PeckSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- In Re Concord Teachers (Nh Ret. System)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.