Legal Opinion

Romero v. Allstate Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-3894; CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 01-6764; NO. 01-7042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BUCKWALTER, Senior Judge

Currently pending before the Court are: (1) the Motion by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, the Allstate Corporation, Agents Pension Plan, and the Administrative Committee (collectively “Defendants” or “Allstate”) to Dismiss certain claims alleged in the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints; and (2) the Partial Motion of Defendant Edward M. Liddy (“Liddy”) to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints. For the following reasons, the Motions are granted.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Doyle v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API