Fearnley v. De Mainville
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
Appellees, in 1888, were the owners of a building in Lead-ville that had been used as a United States post office previous to that time. The lease was about to 'expire, and it *442became necessary to make a new contract if the office was retained in the same building., The United States government, feeling it absolutely necessary to exercise economy, without consulting the convenience of the people, required, as a bonus for mail delivery, that office room should be furnished gratuitously, or at nominal rent. For the purpose of retaining the post offioe in the building, and having to compete with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Townsley v. SumrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Elkhart County Lodge v. CraryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Haines v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hare v. PhaupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Davis v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Troutman v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Schlitz Brewing Co. v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Cherry v. City State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.