Legal Opinion

Herbert P. Reardon and John E. Reardon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1978No. 77-2145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this federal estate tax dispute, the Government valued the property in a Louisiana estate at the time taxpayers received a judgment of possession, asserting that the judgment represented a “distribution” within the meaning of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2032(a)(1) (1967) (amended 1970, 1976). See Stoutz v. United States, 324 F.Supp. 197, 200-203 (E.D.La.1970), aff’d, 439 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1971). The taxpayers would distinguish Stoutz on the ground that the succession here was intestate, the heirs were seized of the succession as of the moment of death, and the judgment of possession worked no change…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stoutz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  2. Dr. Henry Lewis Stoutz, III and Mrs. Fancher Marie Stoutz Coe, as Transferees of the Estate of Ruth Harvey Fancher Stoutz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Land v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  5. Reardon v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API