Legal Opinion

Reardon v. United States

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1977No. 760252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, Senior District Judge.

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS

Plaintiffs, Herbert P. Reardon and John E. Reardon, claim that defendant, United States of America, through the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.), wrongfully made an estate tax deficiency assessment upon corporate stock which they inherited from their father, Herbert H. Reardon. Plaintiffs seek a refund for the additional assessment which they paid under protest. Our jurisdiction rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).

The matter is before us on cross motions for summary judgment. The facts are undisputed and are set forth in the original and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973
  2. Hertsche v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  3. Stoutz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  4. Land v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  5. Cooper v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Herbert P. Reardon and John E. Reardon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API