Legal Opinion

Land v. United States

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided April 8, 1977No. 760258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, Senior District Judge.

RULING ON MOTIONS

Presented for decision are cross motions for summary judgment. Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land claim that they wrongfully were assessed additional estate tax after closing their mother’s succession. They paid the additional assessment under protest and now seek a refund from the United States, which opposes their claim. Our jurisdiction rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).

Plaintiffs and defendant stipulated the following facts in their original and amended pretrial stipulations:

“6. Plaintiffs and defendant agree as to the following facts:

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Key v. SalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Hertsche v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  3. Vordenbaumen v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Stoutz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  5. Estate of Prell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Reardon v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  3. Herbert P. Reardon and John E. Reardon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API