Bridges v. Lanham
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saline county. Tried below before Weaver, J. cited: Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch., 341. Paine v. Sherwood, 9 Minn., 315. Booth v. Spuyten Buyvil Co., 60 N. Y., 487, Gilbert v. Kennedy, 22 Mich., 117. 2 Wait’s Actions and Defenses, 454. Griffin v. Colver, 16 N. Y., 489. cited: French v. Bamge, 2 Neb., 254. Howe v. Bryson, 44 Iowa, 159. McFkoen v. McKinnon, 11 N. W. R., 828.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This action was commenced in the court below by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error for the agreed price of a stone flume furnished and built by him for them under a contract.
The defendants answered and set up as a defense and counter-claim that it was a part of the said contract for the *370building of the said flume, that the same should be erected and built in a good and workmanlike manner, and to the satisfaction of the said plaintiffs in error, and fully completed on or before the first day of December, 1880. That said plaintiff (defendant in error) did not perform the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Sycamore Marsh Harvester Manufacturing Co. v. SturmNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Paola Gas Co. v. Paola Glass Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Stubblefield v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.