Sycamore Marsh Harvester Manufacturing Co. v. Sturm
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Post, J. Contract of Stabler & Deisher was not binding on plaintiff. 1 Parsons on Contracts, 54. Long v. Colburn, 11 Mass., 97. Magill v. Hinsdale, 6 Conn., 464. Hancock v. Fairfield, 30 Me., 299. Merchant’s Bank v. Hayes, 7 Hun., 530. Hayes v. Crutcher, 54 Ind., 260. On question of warranty cited: Nichols v. Hail, 4 Neb., 210. Edgerly v. Gardner, 9 Neb., 130. On damages, cited: Field, 266, 275. Crosby v.…
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Post, J. Contract of Stabler & Deisher was not binding on plaintiff. 1 Parsons on Contracts, 54. Long v. Colburn, 11 Mass., 97. Magill v. Hinsdale, 6 Conn., 464. Hancock v. Fairfield, 30 Me., 299. Merchant’s Bank v. Hayes, 7 Hun., 530. Hayes v. Crutcher, 54 Ind., 260. On question of warranty cited: Nichols v. Hail, 4 Neb., 210. Edgerly v. Gardner, 9 Neb., 130. On damages, cited: Field, 266, 275. Crosby v. Watkins, 12 Cal., 85. Hamilton v. McPherson, 28 New York, 72. McClary v. S. C. & P. R. R., 3 Neb., 54. Berry v. Dioinel, 44…
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This action was brought on a promissory note executed by the defendant in error to the plaintiff in error, for the *212sum of fifty dollars and interest. In the court below the defendant answered that the note sued on was made and executed to the said plaintiff on a contract made and executed between Stabler & Deisher as agents of the plaintiff and the defendant. That by virtue of said contract, said plaintiff conditionally sold and delivei’ed to said defendant a certain combined reaper and mower; that at the time of making said contract, said plaintiff agreed to set said machine up in running…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dolvin v. American Harrow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Omaha Coal, Coke & Lime Co. v. FayNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Uhlig v. BarnumNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Bank of Commerce v. GoosNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.