Archer v. Long
Supreme Court of South Carolina
The facts are fully stated in the following order on Circuit: This was an action of claim and delivery, tried at the October term, 1890, of this Court. The verdict and judgment was in favor of the defendant, for the return of the property in dispute, or for the sum of $1,700, the value thereof, in case a recovery could not be had, and for the costs and disbursements of the action.
Read the full summary
The facts are fully stated in the following order on Circuit: This was an action of claim and delivery, tried at the October term, 1890, of this Court. The verdict and judgment was in favor of the defendant, for the return of the property in dispute, or for the sum of $1,700, the value thereof, in case a recovery could not be had, and for the costs and disbursements of the action. The sheriff being a party to the suit, execution was issued to and lodged with the coroner of the county, who, on April the 15th, 1893, delivered to the defendant a part of the property described in the execution,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This action was commenced on the llth of August, 1888, for claim and delivery of nine mules, three wagons, five cows, seven hogs, a lot of farming implements, a threshing machine and fan. The case was tried at the October (1890) term of the Court, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant for the return of the property in dispute, or for the sum of $1,700, the value thereof, in case a delivery could not be had. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict, and for the costs and disbursements of the action.. The sheriff being a…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Wilkins v. WillimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Reynolds v. PhilipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Malcolm Mercantile Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Wilkins v. WillimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924