Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Philips

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Gary, J., Richland, April, 1904. Action by Jim Reynolds against E. E. Philips et al. From Circuit order dismissing magistrate judgment, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This appeal raises the question as to the jurisdiction of a magistrate in claim and delivery proceedings. The action was commenced in a magistrate’s court to recover the possession of certain chattels, or if a return thereof could not be had, then for $100, the alleged value thereof, together with $75 damages.

The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant for the possession of the property, or in case a return thereof could not be had, for $100, the value thereof, and $50 damages. The defendant appealed to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catawba Mills v. HoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  2. Archer v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. WillimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Rhode v. Ray Waits Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Greene v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Matheny v. Bank of NashvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API