Lara v. State

OPINION

William J. Boyce, Justice

Appellant Luis Eduardo Lara appeals his convictions for sexual assault of a child,1 indecency with a child,2 and continuous sexual abuse of a child.3 He argues that the trial court erred by allowing the State to (1) introduce extraneous offense evidence without providing notice to appellant; and (2) “consolidate all three cases for trial.” We affirm.

*138Background

Appellant was about 20 years old when he met complainants John Jenkins, John Doe, and John Smith at a skate park in Galveston.4 Complainants were young teenagers at the time they met appellant. They all…