Legal Opinion

Holland v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSSMAN J.

This is an appeal by Paul Courter Holland, plaintiff, from a judgment order of the circuit court which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The defendant is the Warden of the Oregon State Penitentiary. The plaintiff is an inmate of that institution. The complaint challenges the validity of his imprisonment by alleging:

“That the cause or pretence [sic] of such imprisonment and restraint according to the best knowledge and belief of your petitioner, is an order as amended by a Nunc Pro Tune Order, State of Oregon, Plaintiff vs Paul Courter Holland, Defendant, Case No.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Northcott v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Holland v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Holland v. StrawnOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary v. Paul Courter HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API