Legal Opinion

(PC) Black v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 30, 2024No. 2:21-cv-02167Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY LAMAR BLACK, No. 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 P. THOMPSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal inmate proceeding without counsel in a civil right action brought 18 under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388 19

(1971). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court determined that plaintiff’s first amended 20 complaint (FAC), ECF No. 34, alleged a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claim…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API