Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Brewer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1998No. 96-0706PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal question in this case is whether plaintiffs have raised a fact issue about the fitness of a certain restraint system in General Motors passenger cars for the ordinary purposes for which it is used. We hold that plaintiffs have not done so.

Thomas Brewer and others sued General Motors Corporation and a car dealership on behalf of themselves and all persons who, as of August 29, 1994, owned General Motors passenger cars manufactured since 1987 that have an automatic, non-motorized, passive, three-point restraint system employing door-mounted restraint retractors. Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brewer v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Coastal Conduit & Ditching, Inc. v. Noram Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Fry, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API