In the Interest of V. H.

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the suppression court’s order entered on December 7, 2000, granting V.H.’s motion to suppress oral statements made by him to detectives of the City of Pittsburgh.1 We reverse and remand for a trial.

¶2 The standard of review has been stated recently by this Court in Commonwealth v. Mannion, 725 A.2d 196, 198 (Pa.Super.1999) (en banc); to-wit:

When reviewing an appeal from a suppression court’s decision, we must first determine whether the record supports the court’s factual findings. Commonwealth v. Williams, 539 Pa. 61, 71, 650 A.2d 420, 425 (1994). When the…