Legal Opinion

Interstate Cotton Oil Refining Co. v. Refining, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 2, 1938No. H-201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judg'e.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment in which the petition was filed December 29, 1937, praying for a decree: (a) That patents granted to defendant, Nos. 2,100,274, 2,100,275, 2,100,276, and 2,100,277, on November 23, 1937, be declared void, invalid, and to no effect, as to each of the claims thereof in view of approximately seventy items of the prior art; (b) that it be decreed plaintiff’s processes do not infringe any of the claims of said patents, and that plaintiff has the right to practice the processes defined in its petition, without threat, or other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Automotive Equipment v. Trico Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  4. Whitmore v. Salt Lake CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Central R. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Lances v. LetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Rozelle v. QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  5. Refractolite Corp. v. Prismo Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API