Legal Opinion
Refractolite Corp. v. Prismo Holding Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1940Published
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge. ‘
The suit is brought pursuant to Sec. 274d of the Judicial Code, Title 28 U.S. C. Sec. 400, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment against the defendants in respect to their patent No. 1,902,440, issued on the application of Edwin R. Gill, Jr., to Prismo Holding Corporation as assignee for an invention relating to signs; and by counterclaim the defendants seek a declaratory judgment in respect to patent No. 2,043,-414, issued to Fred H. Korff for an improvement in markers for highways. The Gill patent was applied for on January 15, 1932 and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Booth Fisheries Corporation v. General Foods Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1939
- Duro Test Corp. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1937
- Interstate Cotton Oil Refining Co. v. Refining, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1938