Legal Opinion
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 9, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
This is a companion case to Howard v. Reliance Insurance, Company, Ky., 347 S.W.2d 508. The trial court held appellant insurance company liable on a $2500 fire insurance policy, even though, in violation of one of its provisions, at the time of the loss the property was covered by another insurance policy.
Prior to 1955 appellees had a $2500 insurance policy with the Canadian Fire Insurance Company (which did not prohibit other insurance). In 1955 it procured a $3,000 policy from the Reliance Insurance Company (which did contain a provision prohibiting other insurance). In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Aetna Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn. v. Jeremiah Provident Fire Ins. Co. v. JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Baer v. Phœnix InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great American Assurance Co. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Howard v. RELIANCE INSURANCE CO. OF PHILADELPHIACourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Kent v. Insurance Company of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973