Legal Opinion

Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Snowden

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 2, 1917PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Jessamine Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op ti-ie Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

Tlie appellee, S. N. Snowden, is a farmer and resides about four miles from Nicbolasville, and previous to tbe 6th day of March, 1915, had carried insurance against fire, upon his property, in the Boston Insurance Company and the Henry Clay Fire Insurance company. The first named company ceased to do business, in the community in which appellee lived, but, he then had a policy of insurance upon his property in the latter company, which insured his dwelling house against fire in the sum ■ of fifteen hundred dollars, and his household and kitchen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Phœnix Ins. v. SpiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Washington Mills Emery Manufacturing Co. v. Weymouth & Braintree Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Alkan v. New Hampshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Carden v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  5. Niagara Fire Insurance v. LayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kellum v. Browning's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Hopkins v. Phoenix Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Preferred Risk Fire Ins. Co. v. NeetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API