Legal Opinion

People v. Quinn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1992No. 91667, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We granted leave in this case to decide whether under MCL 750.227c; MSA 28.424(3), knowledge that a firearm is loaded1 is an element of the offense of transporting or possessing a loaded firearm other than a pistol in or upon a vehicle.2 The Court of Appeals set aside the defendant’s conviction and, because jeopardy precludes retrial following reversal for insufficiency of the *181evidence,3 dismissed the charge. The Court held that knowledge that the firearm was loaded is a necessary element of the offense and that the state had failed to prove that the defendant knew that the firearm was loaded.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. TombsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. ClaypoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API