Legal Opinion

Bartozek v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

It is difficult to believe that counsel of the recognized ability of defendant’s attorneys can seriously urge upon this court a reversal of the order denying the application of the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty. Their argument in that behalf seems to be based upon the decision of this court in Allen v. State, 183 Wis. 323, 197 N. W. 808, where it was held that an arrest under circumstances very similar to those under which the defendant was arrested was unlawful, and that liquor the possession of which was obtained in much the same manner was inadmissible in evidence against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dietz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Allen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sorenson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Moore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. BertrandNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  5. Carter v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API