Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1965Published

1Opinion

On motion for rehearing:

The following memorandum was filed September 7, 1965.

2Per curiam

(on motion for rehearing). Defendant Carter has filed a brief without the benefit of counsel in support of his motion for rehearing after his court-appointed attorney who prosecuted defendant’s writ of error had withdrawn as counsel. This brief does not attack our prior opinion which passed on the only issue raised in defendant’s original brief. Instead these three new issues are raised:(1) Secs. 954.01 and 954.02, Stats., under which the warrant for defendant’s arrest are unconstitutional and void because “contrary…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bartozek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API