Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Lynch

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 17, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0214Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL MATTHEWS, : : Petitioner, : : v. : Civil Action No. 16-0214 (TSC) : ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH, : : Respondent. : MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Michael Matthews’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Appointment of Counsel. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny both the petition and the motion. I. BACKGROUND The petitioner is serving a mandatory term of life imprisonment imposed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Caravalho v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API