Legal Opinion

Demore v. Kim

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 2003No. 01-1491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

538 U.S. 510 (2003)

DEMORE, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL.

v.

KIM.

No. 01-1491.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 15, 2003.

Decided April 29, 2003.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

REHNQUIST, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KENNEDY, J., joined in full, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined as to Part I, and in which O'CONNOR, SCALIA, and THOMAS, JJ., joined as to all but Part I. KENNEDY, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 531. O'CONNOR, J.,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Souter; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Breyer.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Antonio Edior Pierre v. Merrick GarlandDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  3. Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API