Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2016No. 12-73289Published

1DissentClifton, Circuit Judge

The words “equal protection” did not appear in the opening brief- filed on behalf of Petitioner Solomon Ledezma-Cosino. Given that, it is not surprising that they did not appear in the government’s answering brief, either. Ledezma did not file a reply brief. ■ So how did the issue arise? - -

The argument deemed persuasive in the majority opinion is an argument of the majority’s own creation. Ledezma did not make that argument until urged to do so by the majority at oral argument and via a subsequent order for supplemental briefing. Perhaps that pride of authorship helps to explain why the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API