Legal Opinion
Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.
An action in negligence was commenced by the plaintiffs, Dora and Irving Rubinstein, against The Pennsylvania Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as Penn Co.) and Bernard H. Cantor, to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services and medical expenses sustained when a train of Penn Co., at a railroad crossing, struck an automobile owned and operated by Cantor, in which plaintiffs were passengers.
A settlement was agreed upon between the plaintiffs and Cantor in the sum of $7,500, and upon payment plaintiffs executed releases to Cantor, reserving plaintiffs’ rights…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960