Legal Opinion

Bank of Coushatta v. Wimberly

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1925No. 1916Published

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note purporting to have been signed by the defendants.

*93The defendant, Sam. F. Wimberly, made no defense and judgment was rendered against him by' default.

The defendant, Mrs. T. R. Wimberly, answered, denying that the signature on the note was hers.

There was judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand as to her and plaintiff appealed.

The only witnesses that testified as to the genuineness of the signature were W. W. Holley and Mrs. T. R. Wimberly herself.

Holley testified, page 4 of the evidence:

“Q. Did you see Mrs. Wimberly sign this note?
“A. No.

Page 5:

“Q. Would you say…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huddleston v. CoyleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API