Legal Opinion
Raggi v. H. G. Christman Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1926No. 12,361PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.
(after stating the facts)
In approaching the ultimate question for our determination, it is essential that we shall have in mind the fact that the Industrial Board is not a court. In the performance of its statutory duties, it is frequently required to act in a manner which closely resembles judicial action. Nevertheless, it is an administrative body. It belongs to the executive department of the state government and may not exercise judicial power. State Constitution, Art. 3; Kingan & Co. v. Buford (1917), 65 Ind. App. 182, 116 N. E. 754.
Our compensation law contains the following pro- '…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re StonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- New Albany Box & Basket Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Kingan & Co. v. BufordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Driscoll v. Weidely Motors Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Indiana Manufacturers' Reciprocal Ass'n v. DolbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffith v. Raven Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Baxi v. United Technologies Automotive Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Insurance Fund v. HuntIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Taylor v. WoodallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Continental Casualty Co. v. BumpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962