Legal Opinion
State v. Schmitt
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 2001No. 20000037PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Matthew Byron Schmitt appealed from convictions entered upon conditional guilty pleas under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) to manufacturing a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. We remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶2] Schmitt lived with Lester Hol-brook in a house at 502 Morrison Street in West Fargo. In May 1999, a district judge, acting as a magistrate, issued a warrant to search the house. The search warrant was based on a May 26, 1999 sworn affidavit of Special Agent Brent Slade of the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Walter PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Cavendish Farms, Inc. v. Mathiason Farms, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.