Legal Opinion

Layton v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1990No. S010566PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review today the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court of the State of California (review department) that Herbert F. Layton (Layton) be suspended from the practice of law for three years, that execution of the order for such suspension be stayed, and that Layton be placed on probation for five years upon conditions including actual suspension from practice for thirty days. We agree with the review department that Layton wilfully failed to use reasonable diligence to accomplish the purposes for which he was employed (Rules Prof. Conduct, former…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vaughn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Lebbos v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Glage v. Hawes Firearms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Honeycutt v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Lister v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API