Legal Opinion
Glage v. Hawes Firearms Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1990No. H005648PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.
Statement of the Case
Plaintiffs Thomas A. Glage (Glage) and his wife Helen Glage sued defendant Hawes Firearms Company (Hawes), for injuries to Glage allegedly caused by a revolver distributed by Hawes. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Hawes appeals from the judgment, claiming the trial court erred in denying its motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. We agree and reverse the judgment.
Injury, Evidence, and Verdict
On April 16, 1983, Glage was hunting wild boar when the .44 Magnum Hawes Western Marshall he was carrying in a holster…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. KarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Province v. Center for Women's Health & Family BirthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- McDonald v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. CumpianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.