Legal Opinion

Brokamp v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 24, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2020-3574Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELIZABETH BROKAMP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3574 (TJK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Elizabeth Brokamp is a psychologist licensed and located in Virginia who wants to offer teletherapy services to clients in the District of Columbia. But she cannot speak with those clients unless she is licensed as a professional counselor here. So she sued, arguing that the District’s licensure requirement for professional counselors violates the First Amendment both as applied to her and as facially overbroad. The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API