Legal Opinion

Morris Gordon & Son, Inc. v. Totoni

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 7, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The plaintiff brings this bill to compel

specific performance of a provision contained in a construction contract whereby the defendants agreed to execute a conditional sale agreement and a promissory note.1 The *183defendants included a counterclaim in their answer in which they sought damages for an alleged failure by the plaintiff to perform the contract in a “good and workmanlike manner.” The judge made findings of fact and an order for decree, pursuant to which a decree was entered dismissing the counterclaim and granting certain relief (which will be stated hereinafter) to the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Russell v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Lonergan v. Highland Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Lampasona v. CapriottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Pilok v. BednarskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Samia v. Central Oil Co. of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Mogul v. Boston Acceptance Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Clark v. a & J TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Goodyear Service Stores v. GustafsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958
  5. In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API