Legal Opinion

Goodyear Service Stores v. Gustafson

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1958No. 145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of contract to recover a balance of $151.96 for tires and tubes sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant’s answer contained a general denial and allegations of payment, accord and satisfaction, election of remedies and rescission of the original contract. ’ There was a finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $151.96.

The .case was reported because the defendant claimed to be aggrieved by the denial of his requests for rulings numbers 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12 and the “conditional” allowance of numbers 1, 5 and 8. These requests are as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Hurley v. OrnsteenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Bailey v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. MalagutiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bifano v. Patten's Plumbing & Heating Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Brockton Hospital v. CooperMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Palatino v. Carlton Aluminum of New England, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API