Legal Opinion
Schultz v. City of Cumberland
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 5, 1998No. 98-C-0107-CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
In this civil action for declaratory and in-junctive relief, plaintiffs challenge a municipal ordinance enacted by defendant City of Cumberland that establishes a comprehensive licensing and regulatory scheme for all “sexually oriented businesses.” Among other things, the ordinance prohibits the depiction of “specified sexual activities” in a sexually oriented business and it bars anyone from appearing in a state of nudity in such a business. Also, the ordinance limits the hours that sexually oriented businesses may operate and prohibits anyone from…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midvale City Corp. v. HaltomUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Special Souvenirs, Inc. v. Town of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Nightclub Management, Ltd. v. City of Cannon FallsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Kissick v. HuebschDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Schultz, Joseph v. City of CumberlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.