Legal Opinion

Annechino v. Worthy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2012No. 86220-6PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 This case asks us to decide whether particular officers and employees of a bank owed a quasi-fiduciary duty to particular bank depositors. Michael and Theresa Annechino deposited a large amount of money at a bank specifically to ensure that their savings would be protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Depositors and banks generally deal at arm’s length and do not owe one another quasi-fiduciary duties, but the Annechinos relied on bank employees’ recommendations of how to structure their accounts to meet FDIC coverage rules. Unfortunately, the bank went…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Keodalah v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. William Merriman, et ux v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Kitsap Bank v. DenleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Butler v. One West Bank, FSB (In re Butler)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
  5. Moun & Aung Keodalah v. Allstate Insurance Company And Tracey SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API