Legal Opinion

Richard R. Reamer v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1976No. 74-2290PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge.

In this action for breach of an enlistment contract, the plaintiff claims that the military agreed to delay his period of active duty in the reserves until after he had finished a semester of school. The district court found that the contract contained no agreement for a delay. We affirm.

In the summer of 1968, Richard Reamer was ready to enter his second year of law school, but the Selective Service had classified him as 1 — A. After contacting various reserve units, he was given an opportunity to join the army reserves in Salisbury, North Carolina. On August 24, 1968…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michael J. Shelton v. Carl L. Brunson, Col. U. S. Air Force, Commander 3500th Pilot Training Wing, Reese Air Force Base, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ronald Alan Gausmann v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerome Jablon, M.D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. White v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  3. RCM Supply Co. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. James v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Karlin v. ClaytonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API