Legal Opinion

Ronald Alan Gausmann v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1969No. 24217_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Habeas corpus. On November 15, 1965, petitioner enlisted in the United States Army for a period of four years. Item 11 of his enlistment record states “Grade PVT E 1”; Item 13 states “Initial Assignment U.S. Army Europe”; Item 37 states “Remarks, NONE.” He signed a contract which expressly provided that all promises made to him were contained in items 11, 13 and 37 of his enlistment record. The contract provided that his “choice of initial assignment shown in items 13 or 37 * * * [of that record] does not constitute any guarantee that my entire enlistment, will be served in that initial…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael J. Shelton v. Carl L. Brunson, Col. U. S. Air Force, Commander 3500th Pilot Training Wing, Reese Air Force Base, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Richard R. Reamer v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. Karlin v. ClaytonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  4. Richard R. Reamer v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API