United States v. Barry Adams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge.
After a trial held before a Magistrate Judge, Barry Adams was convicted of using and occupying National Forest System land as part of a group of seventy-five or more persons without special-use authorization when such authorization is required, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(k). His misdemeanor conviction was affirmed by the district court. Adams now appeals, arguing that the conviction violated his First Amendment rights. We affirm.
I
Adams is a participant in the Rainbow Family, “a loosely structured group of people who gather at least once a year on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Anthony W. PittsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael D. Linick Henry G. Bailey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MunstermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Paul Rodriguez v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HendricksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Paul Rodriguez v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008