Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Adams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 8, 2004No. 03-30474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge.

After a trial held before a Magistrate Judge, Barry Adams was convicted of using and occupying National Forest System land as part of a group of seventy-five or more persons without special-use authorization when such authorization is required, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(k). His misdemeanor conviction was affirmed by the district court. Adams now appeals, arguing that the conviction violated his First Amendment rights. We affirm.

I

Adams is a participant in the Rainbow Family, “a loosely structured group of people who gather at least once a year on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Anthony W. PittsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Michael D. Linick Henry G. Bailey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. MunstermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Paul Rodriguez v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. HendricksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Paul Rodriguez v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API